Since our last update on CQC inspections (in Autumn 2015) the regulator has now officially rated 1,890 GP practices.

The picture remains largely – or exactly – the same as it was then, as the tables below show:

GP inspection details Autumn

GP inspection details Winter

CQC inspections have so far found that the picture is very positive for GP practices, with the tables indicating a consistent pattern in inspection results. The vast majority – almost 85% – have received the top two ratings, ‘good’ or ‘outstanding’, by the regulator since inspections began in October 2014.

GPs are passing with flying colours and it is very pleasing to see.

However, what those tables above do not show is that there are perhaps variations in ratings both regionally and contractually. Recent research has highlighted this and it is important to look at in more detail. All GP practices ought to know how their practice is performing against its competitors.

A closer look at CQC inspection ratings, from a regional and contractual perspective, may help practices better understand their official rating and provide some context to how practices are performing across the board.

Regional variations

GP practices tend to perform differently in CQC inspections depending on where they are based in the UK, research has shown. Official ratings show that the West Midlands and South Yorkshire regions are outperforming regions in the East Midlands and the South of the country.

The interactive map, published and regularly updated by GPonline, highlights the percentage of practices within a certain region that have been rated as either ‘good’ or ‘outstanding’. The map provides a good overview to the regional variations in CQC inspections of GP practices.

Contract variations

Research also indicates that contract variations exist, with fluctuations in official ratings depending on whether a GP practice holds a GMS, PMS or APMS contract.

The below table shows the rating variations in CQC inspections for different contracts:

GP inspection contract variaitons

Are variations in GP inspection ratings expected?

Scott Sanderson, Healthcare Partner at Hawsons, said: “Regional and contractually variations in CQC inspection ratings are interesting to see, but perhaps not too surprising. APMS practices receive significantly more funding per patient than their PMS and GMS counterparts, for example, so you might expect those to be rated higher. Practices also face specific challenges on a regionally basis, including significant disparities in demand, differences in funding and other issues, such as attracting new partners. Variations are therefore always likely.”

“The variations we are looking at now may not also be a ‘fair’ representation. Although it has now been a year since the new style GP inspections came into force, just a fifth of all practices have now been assessed and officially rated by CQC. That means that there are nearly 6,000 practices still to be inspected; and those inspections could significantly change the current research we are looking at.

“That being said, the overall rating results have not changed at all since our last inspection update, where an additional 390 practices have been rated…so the results we have now might indeed be an accurate benchmark.”

More from our GP practice experts

You can find all of our latest GP practice sector news and newsletters here.

If you are looking for advice in a particular area, please get in touch with your usual Hawsons contact.

Alternatively, we offer all new clients a free initial meeting to have a discussion about their own personal circumstances – find out more or book your free initial meeting here. We have offices in Sheffield, Doncaster and Northampton.

Scott Sanderson

Scott Sanderson Partner

Scott Sanderson began his career with Hawsons and trained as a Chartered Accountant, becoming a partner in 2015, specialising in the healthcare sector and small businesses. For more details and advice, please contact Scott on [email protected] or 0114 266 7141.[/author_info]